Response:US B-1 bombers fly over South Korea in show of force

      In my opinion, I thought the article was more informative than persuasive or analytical. It was targeted to a global audience again and a bit aggressively to North Korea. A part of the article mentioned, America has more troops of destruction under its sleeves and that can be a bit threatening to countries like North Korea who are not allies with America. The writer didn't really have a slant or a bias in the way he wrote the article as it was more informative. The writer did include however, Will Ripely (who was in Pyongyang, the Capital of North Korea) talking about how the North Koreans definitely took notice and was afraid to a degree. The publisher, CNN, is obviously American and wouldn't leave out details like that. The article also portrayed America's supremacy and its power to help its allied nations. Depending on the reader, the article may sound different. For example, a North Korean reading this would perhaps be angered as it is to their common belief that South Korea is "held captive" or "under imperialism" by America- which is not true. The purpose of this article was to make the actions of the American military transparent, project American power, and discourage North Korea from doing stupid actions.